Case Briefs

Helen Palsgraf , Respondent , v . The Long Island RailroadCompany , AppellantCourt of Appeals of New York248 N .Y . 339 (1928FactsA commission was d by the complainant based on the injuries and proceeds that she suffered in the fill station as a moot of an explosion of a package which was dropped by one of the riders . The passenger , in his desire to catch and board the train , ran towards the simple machine and squeeze himself in .

Such act graveld him to drop the 15-inch tizzy works package wrapped in a lore information and on that pointby causing the said explosionIssueWhether or not the train station should be held liable for the injuries suffered by the plaintiff on the ground of negligenceDecisionThe Court of New York Appeals reversed the close of the displace motor hotel and promulgated that the railroad company was not absent at all There was nothing in the show of the package which would indicate that it would explode when droppedRatioNegligence , as the court held , is not actionable unless it involves the invasion of a legally saved intimacy , the violation of a right One who seeks remedy at law does not make out a cause of action by showing without more that there has been constipation to his person...If you want to get a full essay, rate it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper