U.S. Childhood Obesity and Climate Change Article

U.S. Childhood Obesity and Climate Change - Article ExampleIt exemplifies with evidence specific environmental impacts on obesity.In responding to this environmental negativity, the clause points out temper change prep aredness and prevention efforts. These efforts are grouped into two broad categories, which include increased human-powered transportation and increasing physical activity. However, any climate change intervention adopted must be explored for its potential to decrease the probability of injury luck factors. However, as the article suggests, lack of climate change intervention in various locations leads to unintended cause that could otherwise subscribe a positive health implication on childhood obesity (Sheffield & Galvez, 2009).The article uses the piecemeal approach in exemplifying the justification of certain climate change interventions. It bases its explanations from a conjectural literature. It is obvious that the reason of why most cities and state in the Un ited States do not have climate change intervention is the fact that the cost of installation cannot be justified by its benefits (Boarnet & Takahashi, 2010). On the contrary, the article suggests that the decision of whether to justify the construction or installation of this intervention should depend on multidisciplinary assessment. match to this article, the uniqueness and disparities in health effect of each state or regions can be present by childrens development stage, size and/or long life expectancy. As a result, the countenance application of climate change intervention leads to a healthier diet, increased physical activities and improved song quality.The article singles out climate change intervention as the major factors that address the precept for the continued existence of childhood obesity in the United States. According to this article, lack of this facility lay out in place automatically result in paediatric morbidity. However, such arguments are somehow ver y vague and